questions

By
Some questions come to mind:

  • How are the dead being accounted for and respected?
  • How will relatives be able to know: when and were and if their loved one(s) died?
  • How is our government keeping track, so that history may know, how many died and when they died?
  • Will the dead receive a dignified and individual burial?
  • Why is there still no estimate of the dead?


    • And, for the living:

  • What is the state of the water In New Orleans? And in Mississippi and the Bayou?
  • How are relatives who evacuated to different locales being reunited?
  • Will opportunities be created for those who've been evacuated to participate in the rebuilding of the city?
  • What plans are being made in the shelters for the mental health and well being of the survivors...and aiding them in getting back to their lives with their health and dignity intact?

    • Comments

    Pyrrho said…
    did you read the report, front page dkos, iirc, Armando, maybe... anyway... a report that the press is not being allowed in.

    I want to confirm or deny that... the press has to be in there or we won't know anything.

    they will like to write history themselves.
    4:06 PM
    kid oakland said…
    That raises more questions....and it points up the limits of the left right now.

    Can we trust the NYT? CNN? NPR? Our local paper to get the story right?

    It's odd how this has happened, that SO MANY of us feel compelled to lobby the press just to do their job. (ie. we don't know, if they were being kept out how we would know.)

    Fwiw, I can't find a good story with a good link that answers these questions....this news story answers some questions but raises many more.
    4:54 PM
    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    a serious moment

    By
    I was really struck by this photo , which graced the cover of Tuesday's New York Times, showing Ariel Sharon, Condoleeza Rice and James Baker attending a memorial of the late Yitzhak Rabin in Israel. There's something in that picture...in Rice's face, jaw set, eyes hidden behind rockstar sunglasses...and how she is flanked on either side by two men who've played hard-ball power politics for decades: Ariel Sharon, peering beneath his furrowed brow and, always conscious he is being observed, gesturing and thinking...and James Baker, completely hidden behind a permanent dimplomatic mask, an impenetrable sphinx. Of course, that photo sends a powerful message to the world. Rice was in Israel to do serious business . The fact that she brought Baker with her meant that the full weight of the U.S. military-industrial complex... the old guard ...was with her. That trip to Israel was important; and I would guess that U.S. plans and actions regarding Syria were part of that
    Read more

    James Watson: racism alive and well in the USA

    By
    I've spent the last 24 hours reading as the fires ignited by Nobel laureate James Watson have spurred hundreds of racist comments on message boards across the world . The racial views espoused by Watson are not simply pernicious, they are unamerican. The premise that you could walk out your door in the United States and make the claim, with a straight face and in a public place, that you presume that someone is less intelligent than you because of the color of their skin or ethnic background is abhorrent. Watson claims that everyone with Black employees “knows that they are not the equals of Whites” and, somehow, that is supposed to be acceptable? We are supposed to take him seriously…as a scientist? I don’t think so. Watson is about to lose his job and what was left of his reputation. The equality of every citizen, respect for each other including our differences and a sense of the potential inherent in each and every citizen, especially our children, is essential to what it m
    Read more

    Sharks, Carp and Dolphins: applying a model from business to politics

    By
    From where I stand, it is encouraging to read essays expressing creative and critical ways to think about Democratic strategy in what is shaping up to be a significant election year.   Thereisnospoon has served up another solid challenge (always welcome) to Democratic assumptions...and bmaples addendem to that diary (including a nice summary of some thoughts from Markos) extended the idea of a  "broad assault" on conservatism that I (with many others) advocated in the wake of Katrina with flipping the rock . What I'd like to do with this essay is adapt a paradigm from the world of business strategy that I think applies to the Democratic party in 2006.  I think you'll find these ideas dovetail with the above essays, and, I hope, will prove useful tools for thinking about Democratic strategy in 2006... Dudley Lynch's 1989 book Strategy of the Dolphin: Scoring a Win in a Chaotic World divided business strategy into three competing paradigms:  that of Sharks, that
    Read more