Steny Hoyer is no friend of Jerry McNerney

By
You would think that as House Majority Leader, Steny Hoyer would work relentlessly to help freshman Democrats in vulnerable districts keep their promises to their constituents.

Not Steny.

We all know that Jerry McNerney made a pledge in no uncertain terms:

I want to clearly and unequivocally express to you where I stand on the question of executing a responsible redeployment from Iraq:

I am firmly in favor of withdrawing troops on a timeline that includes both a definite start date and a definite end date ("date certain") and uses clearly-defined benchmarks. I am not in favor of an "open-ended" timeline for withdrawal, as some members of Congress have proposed recently.

Steny Hoyer, House Majority Leader, just threw Congressman McNerney under his version of the unstoppable bus...

From the Hill article linked above:

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) came out on Wednesday in favor of holding a vote on a bipartisan Iraqi withdrawal bill. Meanwhile, the party's left wing renewed calls for a pullout and announced a new campaign to block funds for arming and training the Iraq Security Forces.

The bipartisan legislation, authored by Reps. Neil Abercrombie (D-Hawaii) and John Tanner (D-Tenn.), would order Bush to draft plans to withdraw from Iraq but not require them to be implemented. Rep. Phil English (R-Pa.) and two other Republicans have signed on as cosponsors.

"I would like to see us move forward on that," Hoyer said. "The president ought to come up with a plan for withdrawal."

That is, Hoyer supports a plan without a fixed end date, exactly the legislation that Congressman McNerney just went on record opposing. Thanks Steny! That's really helpful to all of us here working our butts off to re-elect Jerry McNerney.

That Hill article makes it seem like the issue of the war in Iraq is a matter of "liberal" vs. "the center" with deceptive claims about "left-wing" policies. We all know a change of course in Iraq is a mainstream issue. Yes, there are many liberals opposed to Bush policy, there are also many moderates and independents who have the same views. Americans want a change of course in Iraq:

-69% of the American public disapproves of Bush on Iraq
-64% of the American public opposes the war in Iraq
-59% of the American public as recently as July favored withdrawing US forces from Iraq to save American lives even if it would leave Iraq unstable

This is not "a liberal issue." The war in Iraq is a mainstream American issue with clear majorities calling for a responsible change of course. Mike Soraghan at the Hill is fooling nobody with that tired frame. That's lazy journalism. And in this case lazy journalism highlights the grave failure of leadership exhibited by our friend from Maryland, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer.

Congressman McNerney has voted consistently for an Iraq policy that would fully fund a change of course in Iraq...a policy that would start bringing our troops home safely and give the Iraqis a firm deadline for taking charge of the security of their own nation. Steny Hoyer wants to toss deadlines out the window. In doing so, he's throwing right-wing Republicans a life preserver and throwing Jerry McNerney under the bus.

Steny Hoyer is no friend of Jerry McNerney or CA-11. If you feel like it, you should let him know....OOPS!!

I guess even though Congressman Hoyer is the House Majority Leader, he doesn't accept emails from us folks out here in the greater USA. Try him on his landlines! Let him know what you think of Democratic leaders who throw our freshmen under the bus:

Congressman Steny Hoyer, House Majority Leader:
Phone - (202) 225-4131
Fax - (202) 225-4300

Comments

DownWithTyranny said…
From the moment the Democrats chose Hoyer as Majority Leader, it was clear that there would be no decisive action against Bush's war agenda-- an agenda Hoyer has always supported, if surreptitiously from time to time.
9:58 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

a serious moment

By
I was really struck by this photo , which graced the cover of Tuesday's New York Times, showing Ariel Sharon, Condoleeza Rice and James Baker attending a memorial of the late Yitzhak Rabin in Israel. There's something in that picture...in Rice's face, jaw set, eyes hidden behind rockstar sunglasses...and how she is flanked on either side by two men who've played hard-ball power politics for decades: Ariel Sharon, peering beneath his furrowed brow and, always conscious he is being observed, gesturing and thinking...and James Baker, completely hidden behind a permanent dimplomatic mask, an impenetrable sphinx. Of course, that photo sends a powerful message to the world. Rice was in Israel to do serious business . The fact that she brought Baker with her meant that the full weight of the U.S. military-industrial complex... the old guard ...was with her. That trip to Israel was important; and I would guess that U.S. plans and actions regarding Syria were part of that
Read more

James Watson: racism alive and well in the USA

By
I've spent the last 24 hours reading as the fires ignited by Nobel laureate James Watson have spurred hundreds of racist comments on message boards across the world . The racial views espoused by Watson are not simply pernicious, they are unamerican. The premise that you could walk out your door in the United States and make the claim, with a straight face and in a public place, that you presume that someone is less intelligent than you because of the color of their skin or ethnic background is abhorrent. Watson claims that everyone with Black employees “knows that they are not the equals of Whites” and, somehow, that is supposed to be acceptable? We are supposed to take him seriously…as a scientist? I don’t think so. Watson is about to lose his job and what was left of his reputation. The equality of every citizen, respect for each other including our differences and a sense of the potential inherent in each and every citizen, especially our children, is essential to what it m
Read more

Sharks, Carp and Dolphins: applying a model from business to politics

By
From where I stand, it is encouraging to read essays expressing creative and critical ways to think about Democratic strategy in what is shaping up to be a significant election year.   Thereisnospoon has served up another solid challenge (always welcome) to Democratic assumptions...and bmaples addendem to that diary (including a nice summary of some thoughts from Markos) extended the idea of a  "broad assault" on conservatism that I (with many others) advocated in the wake of Katrina with flipping the rock . What I'd like to do with this essay is adapt a paradigm from the world of business strategy that I think applies to the Democratic party in 2006.  I think you'll find these ideas dovetail with the above essays, and, I hope, will prove useful tools for thinking about Democratic strategy in 2006... Dudley Lynch's 1989 book Strategy of the Dolphin: Scoring a Win in a Chaotic World divided business strategy into three competing paradigms:  that of Sharks, that
Read more